We live in pretty interesting times. The people's views have changed quite dramatically. What was a big "no-no" only decades ago is today's "sure,why not". The phrase: "Only in America" comes to mind. Medicinal drugs (marijuana) are now legal in certain states and so is the homosexual union. Certain rights are not permitted on the federal level, but state citizens still choose to pursue them anyway.
Internal factors such as technological advancements played a big role in these developments. The power of centralized electronic archives and the world wide web made our lives easier. In the past you had to manually search for a paper document if you were looking for information. Now the desired information is two clicks away (sometimes even one). Another advantage is that back up systems are made and stored in different locations, which means that fires no longer threaten the existence of information.
These advantages can also be major disadvantages. Hackers might attempt to break into these archives from the comfort of their own home. Even the latest firewalls and anti-viruses cannot guarantee that information will not leak. It doesn't mean that bad guys should dictate how we access and store the information either. Database access is still very convenient even for regular people like you and me. Reverse telephone number lookup is a good example of how freedom of information can help people.
You can run a reverse phone lookup on a number to find out who the owner is. This is convenient on many different levels. If one received a phone call from a toll free number he or she can use a reverse lookup to discover the company's name.
Unfortunately this innocent service can be used in a bad way. A person who is using reverse telephone lookup might be a stalker too. He might be looking up information about a person who is not returning his phone calls. But where do we draw the line? This is a perverted mix of freedom of information and potential for privacy violation.
Every single individual should be able to express his opinion. We as people should be the ones dictating what can and cannot be disclosed Our expressions of freedom are like small grains which are easy to lose but hard to get back. Our children might one day find themselves in a complete privacy nightmare. If ever that level of privacy violation is reached it would be extremely hard to change anything. I see only one possible solution which can help us avoid this nightmare. I believe that privacy matters should be voted on by every citizen.
Internal factors such as technological advancements played a big role in these developments. The power of centralized electronic archives and the world wide web made our lives easier. In the past you had to manually search for a paper document if you were looking for information. Now the desired information is two clicks away (sometimes even one). Another advantage is that back up systems are made and stored in different locations, which means that fires no longer threaten the existence of information.
These advantages can also be major disadvantages. Hackers might attempt to break into these archives from the comfort of their own home. Even the latest firewalls and anti-viruses cannot guarantee that information will not leak. It doesn't mean that bad guys should dictate how we access and store the information either. Database access is still very convenient even for regular people like you and me. Reverse telephone number lookup is a good example of how freedom of information can help people.
You can run a reverse phone lookup on a number to find out who the owner is. This is convenient on many different levels. If one received a phone call from a toll free number he or she can use a reverse lookup to discover the company's name.
Unfortunately this innocent service can be used in a bad way. A person who is using reverse telephone lookup might be a stalker too. He might be looking up information about a person who is not returning his phone calls. But where do we draw the line? This is a perverted mix of freedom of information and potential for privacy violation.
Every single individual should be able to express his opinion. We as people should be the ones dictating what can and cannot be disclosed Our expressions of freedom are like small grains which are easy to lose but hard to get back. Our children might one day find themselves in a complete privacy nightmare. If ever that level of privacy violation is reached it would be extremely hard to change anything. I see only one possible solution which can help us avoid this nightmare. I believe that privacy matters should be voted on by every citizen.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire